High Point
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,122  Cozette Collin SR 21:40
1,148  Natalia Ocasio SR 21:41
1,624  Keaton Case SO 22:10
1,786  Zoe Geis FR 22:20
2,064  Kylie Hennessey FR 22:37
2,585  Courtney Kerr SO 23:18
2,642  Emily Boger FR 23:25
2,905  Charis Dinger FR 23:58
3,449  Kallie Baughman FR 26:32
National Rank #220 of 344
Southeast Region Rank #28 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cozette Collin Natalia Ocasio Keaton Case Zoe Geis Kylie Hennessey Courtney Kerr Emily Boger Charis Dinger Kallie Baughman
adidas Challenge 09/16 1263 22:25 23:19 22:05 22:16 22:29 22:31 23:05 26:32
Greensboro Cross Country Invitational 09/24 1245 21:25 22:07 22:06 22:15 22:32 22:46 23:31 25:57
Asheville Challenge 10/01 1272 21:49 21:43 22:21 22:56 22:43 23:31 23:20 23:45 26:19
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1229 21:23 21:26 21:58 22:07 22:32 23:15 23:41 24:36
Big South Championships 10/28 1251 21:45 21:27 22:18 22:14 22:48 23:36 23:58 23:57 27:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.3 782 0.2 0.4 1.4 3.7 6.6 9.0 12.9 16.8 17.8 16.0 10.9 3.2 1.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cozette Collin 121.4
Natalia Ocasio 124.5
Keaton Case 162.8
Zoe Geis 175.2
Kylie Hennessey 197.6
Courtney Kerr 240.2
Emily Boger 245.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.4% 0.4 20
21 1.4% 1.4 21
22 3.7% 3.7 22
23 6.6% 6.6 23
24 9.0% 9.0 24
25 12.9% 12.9 25
26 16.8% 16.8 26
27 17.8% 17.8 27
28 16.0% 16.0 28
29 10.9% 10.9 29
30 3.2% 3.2 30
31 1.1% 1.1 31
32 0.3% 0.3 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0